Grumman F-14 Tomcat

From Scramble - The Aviation Magazine

Jump to: navigation, search
Grumman F-14D Tomcat
060728-N-7241L-015.jpg
Description
RoleAir Defence Fighter
Crew2
First FlightDecember 21st, 1970 (YF-14A)
Entered ServiceSeptember 1974 (with VF-1)
Number built712
ManufacturerGrumman
303-E
Dimensions
Length19.1 m62 ft 9 in
Wingspan (swept)11.58 m38 ft
Wingspan (unswept)19.5 m64 ft
Height4.88 m16 ft
Wing area54.5 m²565 ft²
Weights
Empty19,838 kg43,735 lb
Loaded27,700 kg61,000 lb
Maximum takeoff weight33,720 kg74,350 lb
CapacityN/A
Powerplant
Enginestwo General Electric F110-GE-400 turbofan engines
Thrust61.4 kN (each)13,810 lbf (each)
Performance
Maximum speedMach 2.35
Operational range926 km500 nmiles
Service ceilingmft
Rate of climb229 m/min45,000 ft/min
Avionics
AvionicsRaytheon AN/APG-71
Armament
ArmamentOne General Dynamics (General Electric) M61 Vulcan 20 mm gun plus mix of AIM-9 Sidewinder, AIM-7 Sparrow, AIM-54 Phoenix AAMs

Contents

History

After failure to develop the F-111B in the TFX program as a fleet defence fighter to replace the F-4B/N/S Phantom II, the F-14 Tomcat was developed in the consequent VFX program. From the initial model 303-60, Grumman developed fixed wing and swept wing designs, showing first resemblance to what became the Tomcat. Ultimately, model 303E was developed into the Grumman F-14 Tomcat. The Tomcat was designed around the Hughes AN/AWG-9 radar and associated long range AIM-54 Phoenix missiles and features swing-wings. The F-14 served the US Navy for 32 years and was officially retired on September 22, 2006 at Naval Air Station Oceana.

Versions

Factory models

F-14A

Initial model, with Hughes AN/AWG-9 radar and troublesome TF30-P-412A turbofan engines (replaced during 1983 with more reliable TF30-P-414, later TF30-P-414A turbofan engines. The TF30 proved prone to compressor stalls and throttle changes above 30,000 ft. Main weapon was the Raytheon (Hughes) AIM-54 Phoenix radar guided air-to-air missiles. The theoretically maximum of six Phoenix missiles were seldom carried, as the Tomcat could only land on a carrier with four of these missiles. The F-14A(TARPS) is wired for a recce pod with AN/AAD-5 IRLS and optical cameras. Main upgrade was the F-14A+, which finally introduced proper and much more powerful engines, the F110-GE-400 turbofan. Redesignated F-14B. The JF−14A Tomcat Special Test Aircraft was used for TF30-P-414 development.

F-14B

The F-14B designation was used twice by the US Navy. In 1973, it was used to identify a F-14A successor powered by F401-PW-400 engines. The development was discontinued. The second time, the designation was usd to identify F-14A+ models, redesignated F-14B on 1 May 1991. Existing airframes were fitted with with F110-GE-400 turbofan engines (129 kN augmented thrust), AN/ALR-67 and AN/AWG-15F FCS. In total, 38 new aircraft were built and 48 F-14As were upgraded.

F-14C

Proposal put forward by Grumman in 1973, with improved avionics. Cancelled.

F-14D

Ultimate Tomcat variant based on the F-14B powered by F110-GE-400 turbofan engines, with new AN/APG-71 radar, AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles and air-to-ground avionics and weapons (AGM-88 HARM), AN/ALQ-165 Advanced Self Protection Jammer, NVG. Upgraded F-14A's are designated F-14D(R), while the NF-14D is a flying test bed for weapons development. In June 1996 the US Navy upgraded the Tomcat with the AN/AAQ-14 targeting pod as the Block I upgrade. Also, the Tomcat was also upgraded with NVG compatibility, and improved defensive countermeasures through the LAU-138 BOL chaff-dispensing launch rail, which replaced the LAU-7 Sidewinder launch rail, retaining the ability to launch the AIM-9 Sidewinder and adding a significant increase in chaff expendable stores. Modified F-14D Tomcats were nicknamed Bombcats. The final operational carrier launch was on July 28th 2006 (F-14D 163417 of VF-31 Tomcatters).

F-14X

In August 1973, Congress mandated that the US Navy to pursue a lower-cost alternative to the F-14. Grumman proposed a stripped F-14 designated the F-14X, while McDonnell Douglas proposed a navalized F-15, but both were nearly as expensive as the F-14. Eventually, the Department of Defense ordered the US Navy to evaluate the competitors in the Air Force's Lightweight Fighter (LWF) program, eventually leading to the development of the F/A-18 Hornet.

Grumman model designators

303-60

During the period 1966-67 while trying to trim (although carve would be more appropriate) weight from the F-111B, the US Navy was also providing funding to Grumman to look into advanced fighter studies. By 1967 this had led Grumman to suggest taking the VFAX airframe and wrapping it around the F-111B engines and AN/AWG-9/Phoenix weapons system. The extensive use of titanium would be one way of lightening up the airframe and moving away from the weight issues that beset the F-111B, and the new airframe would meet the air superiority requirements that were emerging from the future fighter studies. Liking what they saw, the US Navy funded another round of studies, Navy Fighter Study II, between Feb-Mar 1968. During this study they compared, on paper, a proposed VFX (Grumman design 303-60) vs the F-111B and without question, the F-111B was smoked. The twin engined, single tailed VFX would out accelerate, climb and turn the F-111B and the F-4 Phantom II by significant margins.

303A

Nacelle Modification of 303-60 with podded engines and high placed variable sweep-wing.

303B

Design 303-60 updated for configuration comparison with podded engines and high placed variable sweep-wing.

303C

Submerged engines, high placed variable sweep-wing.

303D

Submerged Engines, low placed variable sweep-wing.

303E

The winning F-14 design, podded engines, high placed variable sweep-wing.

303F

Submerged engines, high placed fixed wing.

303G

A fighter only version (AN/AWG-10, 4 AIM-7 Sparrows) without Phoenix capability. Podded engines, high placed variable sweep-wing.

Operators

Images

More information

External links

Sources

Personal tools